The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eyes on the herd: Quantifying ungulate density from satellite, unmanned aerial systems, and GPScollar data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eap.2600 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tabitha A. Graves, Michael J. Yarnall, Aaron N. Johnston, Todd M. Preston, Geneva W. Chong, Eric K. Cole, William M. Janousek, Paul C. Cross |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,477,694
of 23,937,746 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,527
of 3,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,524
of 429,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#48
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,937,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.