The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Comprehensive Survey on Program Synthesis With Evolutionary Algorithms
|
---|---|
Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1109/tevc.2022.3162324 |
Authors |
Dominik Sobania, Dirk Schweim, Franz Rothlauf |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 25% |
Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 9 | 45% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
#96
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,031
of 445,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.