The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brain response to affective pictures in the chimpanzee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep01342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Hirata, Goh Matsuda, Ari Ueno, Hirokata Fukushima, Koki Fuwa, Keiko Sugama, Kiyo Kusunoki, Masaki Tomonaga, Kazuo Hiraki, Toshikazu Hasegawa |
| Abstract |
Advancement of non-invasive brain imaging techniques has allowed us to examine details of neural activities involved in affective processing in humans; however, no comparative data are available for chimpanzees, the closest living relatives of humans. In the present study, we measured event-related brain potentials in a fully awake adult chimpanzee as she looked at affective and neutral pictures. The results revealed a differential brain potential appearing 210 ms after presentation of an affective picture, a pattern similar to that in humans. This suggests that at least a part of the affective process is similar between humans and chimpanzees. The results have implications for the evolutionary foundations of emotional phenomena, such as emotional contagion and empathy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 31% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,062,991
of 26,589,560 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,933
of 147,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,111
of 207,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#39
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.