The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of Diagnostic Bones to Identify and Estimate Original Lengths of Ingested Prey Fishes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1577/1548-8659(1988)117<0055:uodbti>2.3.co;2 |
Authors |
Hal C. Hansel, Stephen D. Duke, Peter T. Lofy, Gerard A. Gray |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 25% |
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 45% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 25% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
#409
of 1,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,259
of 191,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
#201
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.