You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
北海道の建築板金技術の発展経緯と現代の住宅作品への影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3130/aija.82.1115 |
| Authors |
Ryo SATO, Takeo OZAWA, Satoru KAKU |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#380
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,919
of 325,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.