↓ Skip to main content

未利用資源「キャベツの芯」の成分とそのギョウザたねへの活用

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Home Economics of Japan, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 253)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
未利用資源「キャベツの芯」の成分とそのギョウザたねへの活用
Published in
Journal of Home Economics of Japan, October 2021
DOI 10.11428/jhej.72.664
Authors

工藤 美奈子, 小泉 昌子, 山本 遼, 倉田 幸治, 千代田 路子, 有泉 雅弘, 峯木 眞知子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#905,015
of 26,544,375 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#3
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,881
of 448,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them