The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping aquifer salinity gradients and effects of oil field produced water disposal using geophysical logs: Elk Hills, Buena Vista and Coles Levee Oil Fields, San Joaquin Valley, California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0263477 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janice M. Gillespie, Michael J. Stephens, Will Chang, John G. Warden |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,342,903
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#142,994
of 206,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,787
of 429,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,085
of 4,596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.