↓ Skip to main content

パンツパターン作図法の検討―図学的手法による―

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Graphic Science of Japan, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
パンツパターン作図法の検討―図学的手法による―
Published in
Journal of Graphic Science of Japan, August 2010
DOI 10.5989/jsgs.25.supplement_42
Authors

宮川 由香, 三吉 満智子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Graphic Science of Japan
#16
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,605
of 104,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Graphic Science of Japan
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.