The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endoscopic Endonasal Dural Reconstruction for a Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in the Middle Cranial Fossa of a Patient with Gorham-stout Disease with Skull Base Defect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NMC Case Report Journal, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0319 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yusuke Morinaga, Hiroyoshi Akutsu, Hiroyoshi Kino, Shuho Tanaka, Hidetaka Miyamoto, Masahide Matsuda, Eiichi Ishikawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from NMC Case Report Journal
#55
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,175
of 447,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NMC Case Report Journal
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.