↓ Skip to main content

寿司職人に生じたアワビによる接触蕁麻疹症候群の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Dermatology and Cutaneous Allergology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
229 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
寿司職人に生じたアワビによる接触蕁麻疹症候群の1例
Published in
Journal of Environmental Dermatology and Cutaneous Allergology, June 2017
DOI 10.18934/jedca.11.2_158
Authors

木村 友香, 加藤 敦子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#288,236
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Dermatology and Cutaneous Allergology
#1
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,834
of 333,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Dermatology and Cutaneous Allergology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them