The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fire‐driven vegetation type conversion in Southern California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Applications, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/eap.2626 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandra D. Syphard, Teresa J. Brennan, Heather Rustigian‐Romsos, Jon E. Keeley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#12,905,782
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,341
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,795
of 440,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#67
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.