↓ Skip to main content

The potential of semi-structured citizen science data as a supplement for conservation decision-making: Validating the performance of eBird against targeted avian monitoring efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential of semi-structured citizen science data as a supplement for conservation decision-making: Validating the performance of eBird against targeted avian monitoring efforts
Published in
Biological Conservation, June 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109556
Authors

Erica F. Stuber, Orin J. Robinson, Emily R. Bjerre, Mark C. Otto, Brian A. Millsap, Guthrie S. Zimmerman, Michael G. Brasher, Kevin M. Ringelman, Auriel M.V. Fournier, Aaron Yetter, Jennifer E. Isola, Viviana Ruiz-Gutierrez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer 1 2%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Computer Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#551,877
of 26,242,030 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#436
of 6,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,108
of 451,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,242,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.