↓ Skip to main content

Using predictions from multiple anthropogenic threats to estimate future population persistence of an imperiled species

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using predictions from multiple anthropogenic threats to estimate future population persistence of an imperiled species
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, August 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02143
Authors

Brian Folt, Michael Marshall, Jo Anna Emanuel, Michelina Dziadzio, Jane Cooke, Lourdes Mena, Matthew Hinderliter, Scott Hoffmann, Nicole Rankin, John Tupy, Conor McGowan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 32%
Unspecified 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,267,344
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#392
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,428
of 432,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.