↓ Skip to main content

Shallow Faulting and Folding in the Epicentral Area of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shallow Faulting and Folding in the Epicentral Area of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake
Published in
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 2022
DOI 10.1785/0120210329
Authors

Thomas L. Pratt, Anjana K. Shah, Ronald C. Counts, J. Wright Horton, Martin C. Chapman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,874,327
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#233
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,553
of 444,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.