The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
うまみ成分として添加されているCandida utilis(別名: トルラ酵母)を含む学校給食を喫食後に呼吸困難を呈し,血中Candida utilis IgE抗体を証明した2症例―prick to prick testの有用性―
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Shoni Arerugi Gakkaishi. The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3388/jspaci.28.777 |
Authors |
黒坂 文武, 西尾 久英 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 6 | 13% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,163,837
of 26,528,445 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Shoni Arerugi Gakkaishi. The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,688
of 292,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Shoni Arerugi Gakkaishi. The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,528,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them