The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Opportunities for businesses to use and support development of SEEA-aligned natural capital accounts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecosystem Services, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101434 |
Authors |
Jane Carter Ingram, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Michael Vardon, Charles R. Rhodes, Stephen Posner, Clyde F. Casey, Pierre D. Glynn, Carl D. Shapiro |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 44% |
Australia | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 36 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,004,469
of 24,127,822 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#325
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,353
of 431,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,822 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.