The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12855 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Manfredo, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Tara L. Teel, David Fulton, Shalom H. Schwartz, Robert Arlinghaus, Shigehiro Oishi, Ayse K. Uskul, Kent Redford, Shinobu Kitayama, Leeann Sullivan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 17% |
| Canada | 9 | 7% |
| United States | 9 | 7% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 54% |
| Scientists | 58 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 875 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 865 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 153 | 17% |
| Researcher | 141 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 14% |
| Unknown | 170 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 260 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 165 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 90 | 10% |
| Psychology | 39 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 92 | 11% |
| Unknown | 215 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#473,006
of 26,503,921 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#227
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,244
of 438,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.