↓ Skip to main content

なぜインド仏教は消滅したか(近代国家におけるサンガ・僧侶,パネル,<特集>第七十回学術大会紀要)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of religious studies, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
なぜインド仏教は消滅したか(近代国家におけるサンガ・僧侶,パネル,<特集>第七十回学術大会紀要)
Published in
Journal of religious studies, July 2017
DOI 10.20716/rsjars.85.4_966
Authors

立川 武蔵

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,760,263
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of religious studies
#55
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,025
of 329,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of religious studies
#34
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.