↓ Skip to main content

大正の碩学,永澤六郎と『動物学雑誌』

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大正の碩学,永澤六郎と『動物学雑誌』
Published in
Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology, May 2022
DOI 10.50826/bnmnszool.48.2_97
Authors

川田 伸一郎, 下稲葉 さやか, 平田 逸俊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,277,849
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology
#7
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,696
of 447,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.4. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them