↓ Skip to main content

Current Status of Large-Scale Point Processing Captured by Terrestrial Laser Scanner

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Status of Large-Scale Point Processing Captured by Terrestrial Laser Scanner
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, January 2013
DOI 10.2493/jjspe.79.384
Authors

Hiroshi MASUDA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,554,411
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,873
of 289,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.