↓ Skip to main content

東京湾臨海埋立地の草原植生への樹木の侵入と定着

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
東京湾臨海埋立地の草原植生への樹木の侵入と定着
Published in
Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.18922/jjfe.38.1_62
Authors

星野 義延, 笠原 聡, 奥富 清, 亀井 裕幸

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#945,876
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Forest Environment
#1
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,349
of 328,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Forest Environment
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.