You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
脱フュージョンの作用機序の解明に関する基礎研究(2) : 刺激の物理的特徴にもとづく刺激機能の変換に対する文脈制御の般化
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.24468/jjbt.38.3_225 |
| Authors |
木下 奈緒子, 大月 友, 酒井 美枝, 武藤 崇 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,332,383
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#217
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,602
of 367,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.