↓ Skip to main content

Are there spurious temperature trends in the United States Climate Division database?

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are there spurious temperature trends in the United States Climate Division database?
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, April 2003
DOI 10.1029/2002gl016295
Authors

Barry D. Keim, Adam M. Wilson, Cameron P. Wake, Thomas G. Huntington

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#10,608
of 22,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,089
of 63,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#35
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.