The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
シカの採食影響に対する尾瀬ヶ原の湿原植物群落の脆弱性評価
|
---|---|
Published in |
低温科学, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.14943/lowtemsci.80.491 |
Authors |
正人 吉川, 義延 星野, 春香 大橋, 菜々子 大志万, 祈星 長野 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,715,810
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from 低温科学
#16
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,942
of 455,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 低温科学
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them