↓ Skip to main content

LDへのICT活用の効用と限界

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LDへのICT活用の効用と限界
Published in
Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, August 2019
DOI 10.20615/jscap.58.3_379
Authors

福本 理恵, 平林 ルミ, 中邑 賢龍

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,622,529
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
#4
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,964
of 353,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.