The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigation and Improvement of Pushing Dislocation in Ceramsite Sand Three-Dimensional Printing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1089/3dp.2021.0088 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guili Gao, Zhimin Du, Weikun Zhang, Qingyi Liu, Yanqing Su, Yunqiang Ni, Dequan Shi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
#98
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,201
of 419,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them