The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Morphological description and molecular barcoding of the aegathoid stage of Nerocila japonica Schioedte & Meinert, 1881 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cymothoidae) infesting red seabream Pagrus major (Temminck & Schlegel, 1843)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Crustacean Research, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.18353/crustacea.51.0_47 |
| Authors |
Nobuhiro Saito, Hiroki Fujita |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,165,451
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Crustacean Research
#37
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,510
of 444,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crustacean Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.