You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations Between Prenatal Urinary Biomarkers of Phthalate Exposure and Preterm Birth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Pediatrics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2252 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barrett M. Welch, Alexander P. Keil, Jessie P. Buckley, Antonia M. Calafat, Kate E. Christenbury, Stephanie M. Engel, Katie M. O'Brien, Emma M. Rosen, Tamarra James-Todd, Ami R. Zota, Kelly K. Ferguson, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, José F. Cordero, John D. Meeker, Emily S. Barrett, Nicole R. Bush, Ruby H. N. Nguyen, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Shanna H Swan, David E. Cantonwine, Thomas F. McElrath, Jenny Aalborg, Dana Dabelea, Anne P. Starling, Russ Hauser, Carmen Messerlian, Yu Zhang, Asa Bradman, Brenda Eskenazi, Kim G. Harley, Nina Holland, Michael S. Bloom, Roger B. Newman, Abby G. Wenzel, Joseph M. Braun, Bruce P. Lanphear, Kimberly Yolton, Pam Factor-Litvak, Julie B. Herbstman, Virginia A. Rauh, Erma Z. Drobnis, Amy E. Sparks, J. Bruce Redmon, Christina Wang, Alexandra M. Binder, Karin B. Michels, Donna D. Baird, Anne Marie Z. Jukic, Clarice R. Weinberg, Allen J. Wilcox, David Q. Rich, Barry Weinberger, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Deborah J. Watkins, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Rebecca J. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 21% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 73 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 68% |
| Scientists | 20 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 757. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#27,020
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#129
of 6,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#861
of 437,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#6
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.