The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Large-scale distribution models for optimal prediction of Eastern black rail habitat within tidal ecosystems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02222 |
Authors |
Bryan S. Stevens, Courtney J. Conway, Kirsten Luke, Aimee Weldon, Christine E. Hand, Amy Schwarzer, Fletcher Smith, Craig Watson, Bryan D. Watts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 29% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,778,896
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#1,135
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,170
of 436,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#78
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.