The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ビリーフの形成と変化の機制についての研究(3) : カルト・マインド・コントロールにみるビリーフ・システム変容過程
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.14966/jssp.kj00003725250 |
Authors |
西田 公昭 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 88 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 94 | 94% |
Scientists | 3 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#663,114
of 26,556,052 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#5
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,873
of 422,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.