↓ Skip to main content

Clinical evaluation of changes in biomarkers by oral intake of NMN.

Overview of attention for article published in Glycative Stress Research, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical evaluation of changes in biomarkers by oral intake of NMN.
Published in
Glycative Stress Research, July 2022
DOI 10.24659/gsr.9.2_33
Authors

Yuji Morita, Hiromi Izawa, Atsuyuki Hirano, Eriko Mayumi, Seigo Isozaki, Yoshikazu Yonei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Glycative Stress Research
#11
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,736
of 421,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycative Stress Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them