The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COPD患者におけるチオトロピウム・インダカテロール併用からグルコピロニウム/インダカテロール配合剤への変更による効果
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.15032/jsrcr.26.1_73 |
| Authors |
宇津木 光克, 松崎 晋一, 蜂巣 克昌, 矢冨 正清, 久田 剛志, 山田 正信, 土橋 邦生, 丸田 栄 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#35
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,985
of 313,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them