The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Single-chip pulse programmer for magnetic resonance imaging using a 32-bit microcontroller
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Scientific Instruments, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1063/1.2773636 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinya Handa, Thierry Domalain, Katsumi Kose |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 37% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,047,072
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Review of Scientific Instruments
#2,065
of 10,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,540
of 69,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Scientific Instruments
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.