↓ Skip to main content

日常業務で使う機械翻訳ツール(<特集>機械翻訳)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日常業務で使う機械翻訳ツール(<特集>機械翻訳)
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, May 2017
DOI 10.18919/jkg.55.8_331
Authors

下畑 さより

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#121
of 1,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,307
of 328,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#15
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.