The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Occurrence of all-cis-5,8,11,14,17,20,23-hexacosaheptaenoic acid (26:7n-3) in roughscale sole Clidoderma asperrimum flesh lipids
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fisheries Science, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12562-011-0387-y |
Authors |
Yuuki Fukuda, Yasuhiro Ando |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 43% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,821,479
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#38
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,268
of 117,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them