The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science facilitation: navigating the intersection of intellectual and interpersonal expertise in scientific collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-022-01217-1 |
| Authors |
Amanda E. Cravens, Megan S. Jones, Courtney Ngai, Jill Zarestky, Hannah B. Love |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,313,810
of 25,937,538 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#726
of 2,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,231
of 435,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#25
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,937,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.