↓ Skip to main content

1967年羽越水害の伝承手法としての「えちごせきかわ大したもん蛇まつり」の成立・継続・効果に関する調査・考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1967年羽越水害の伝承手法としての「えちごせきかわ大したもん蛇まつり」の成立・継続・効果に関する調査・考察
Published in
Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science, February 2021
DOI 10.24762/jndsj.39.2_157
Authors

佐藤 翔輔

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science
#5
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,411
of 454,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them