↓ Skip to main content

流出した旧紅葉山文庫蔵会津・仙台・高田の正保城絵図についての一考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), January 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
流出した旧紅葉山文庫蔵会津・仙台・高田の正保城絵図についての一考察
Published in
Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), January 1987
DOI 10.3130/aijax.377.0_119
Authors

油浅 耕三

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
#2
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,507
of 44,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them