The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstruction of Forests buried by Fuji 1707 Tephra on the Southeastern Slope of Fuji Volcano, Central Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.4116/jaqua.23.245 |
| Authors |
Naomichi MIYAJI, Shuichi NOSHIRO, Mutsuhiko MINAKI |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,762,048
of 26,402,896 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#160
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,955
of 39,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them