↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Single-step Bioassay Microdevice Using a Reagent Immobilization Method Based on Inkjet Printing

Overview of attention for article published in Bunseki Kagaku, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a Single-step Bioassay Microdevice Using a Reagent Immobilization Method Based on Inkjet Printing
Published in
Bunseki Kagaku, April 2021
DOI 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.70.125
Authors

Yuko KAWAI, Akihiro SHIRAI, Masaya KAKUTA, Kotaro IDEGAMI, Kenji SUEYOSHI, ENDO Tatsuro, Hideaki HISAMOTO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,580,699
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bunseki Kagaku
#244
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,460
of 455,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bunseki Kagaku
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.