The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synchronous Emplacement of the Anorthosite Xenolith‐Bearing Beaver River Diabase and One of the Largest Lava Flows on Earth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2021gc009909 |
| Authors |
Yiming Zhang, Nicholas L. Swanson‐Hysell, Mark D. Schmitz, James D. Miller, Margaret S. Avery |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,137,124
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#467
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,555
of 444,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.