↓ Skip to main content

八重山諸島波照間島の外来性爬虫類に関する新知見およびれまでに同島から報告された爬虫類の記録に関するコメント

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
八重山諸島波照間島の外来性爬虫類に関する新知見およびれまでに同島から報告された爬虫類の記録に関するコメント
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2010
DOI 10.14880/hrghsj1999.2004.128
Authors

太田 英利, 藤井 亮, 岡本 卓, 疋田 努

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#28
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,450
of 105,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.