You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
おなら臭を主訴とした自己臭症患者に対するバイオフィードバック療法
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.15064/jjpm.53.11_1018 |
| Authors |
小林 伸行, 高野 正博, 金澤 嘉昭, 濱川 文彦, 中島 みどり, 霜村 歩, 西尾 幸博, 山田 一隆 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,595,530
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#11
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,416
of 331,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#7
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.