The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
宮崎県日南市から得られた九州東岸初記録のユメタチモドキ(タチウオ科)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.34583/ichthy.23.0_32 |
| Authors |
栗原 巧, 緒方 悠輝也, 村瀬 敦宣 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 94% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,701,252
of 26,415,089 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#12
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,241
of 436,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,415,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them