↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of Strengths and Deficiencies: Disconnects between Graduate Students and Prospective Employers

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of Strengths and Deficiencies: Disconnects between Graduate Students and Prospective Employers
Published in
BioScience, February 2011
DOI 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.8
Authors

Marshall D. Sundberg, Patricia DeAngelis, Kayri Havens, Kent Holsinger, Kathryn Kennedy, Andrea T. Kramer, Rachel Muir, Peggy Olwell, Kristina Schierenbeck, Larry Stritch, Barbara Zorn-Arnold

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 13 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2011.
All research outputs
#6,478,175
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,305
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,351
of 193,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.