↓ Skip to main content

煙型雪崩に対する二層火砕流数値モデルの応用可能性:雪崩・火砕流の統一モデル構築に向けて

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
煙型雪崩に対する二層火砕流数値モデルの応用可能性:雪崩・火砕流の統一モデル構築に向けて
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, August 2022
DOI 10.5331/seppyo.84.4_323
Authors

志水 宏行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice
#68
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,249
of 434,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.