You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本におけるラテン語教育の現状と課題 : 京大文学部のばあいを中心に(シンポジウム発表要旨)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Classical Studies, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20578/jclst.20.0_95_2 |
| Authors |
水野 有庸 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#906,517
of 26,254,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Classical Studies
#3
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,684
of 331,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Classical Studies
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,254,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.