↓ Skip to main content

Local hydrological conditions influence tree diversity and composition across the Amazon basin

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
121 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local hydrological conditions influence tree diversity and composition across the Amazon basin
Published in
Ecography, September 2022
DOI 10.1111/ecog.06125
Authors

Manuel J. Marca‐Zevallos, Gabriel M. Moulatlet, Thaiane R. Sousa, Juliana Schietti, Luiz de Souza Coelho, José Ferreira Ramos, Diogenes de Andrade Lima Filho, Iêda Leão Amaral, Francisca Dionízia de Almeida Matos, Lorena M. Rincón, Juan David Cardenas Revilla, Marcelo Petratti Pansonato, Rogério Gribel, Edelcilio Marques Barbosa, Ires Paula de Andrade Miranda, Luiz Carlos de Matos Bonates, Juan Ernesto Guevara, Rafael P. Salomão, Leandro Valle Ferreira, Dário Dantas do Amaral, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Corine Vriesendorp, Tim R. Baker, Roel Brienen, Marcelo de Jesus Veiga Carim, José Renan da Silva Guimarães, Percy Núñez Vargas, Isau Huamantupa‐Chuquimaco, William F. Laurance, Susan G. W. Laurance, Ana Andrade, José Luís Camargo, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Rodolfo Vasquez, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Hugo F. Mogollón, Ben Hur Marimon‐Junior, Beatriz S. Marimon, Timothy J. Killeen, Emanuelle de Sousa Farias, David Neill, Marcelo Brilhante de Medeiros, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, John Terborgh, Juan Carlos Montero, Juan Carlos Licona, Bonifacio Mostacedo, Roosevelt García‐Villacorta, Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami, Luzmila Arroyo, Daniel Villarroel, Nállarett Dávila, Fernanda Coelho de Souza, Fernanda Antunes Carvalho, James A. Comiskey, Alfonso Alonso, Francisco Dallmeier, Alexandre A. Oliveira, Carolina V. Castilho, Jon Lloyd, Ted R. Feldpausch, Marcos Ríos Paredes, Nicolás Castaño Arboleda, Dairon Cárdenas López, Gerardo A. Aymard Corredor, Anthony Di Fiore, Agustín Rudas, Adriana Prieto, Flávia Rodrigues Barbosa, Janaína Costa Noronha, Domingos de Jesus Rodrigues, Rainiellen de Sá Carpanedo, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Carlos A. Peres, William Milliken, Alfredo Fuentes, J. Sebastián Tello, Carlos Cerón, Bente Klitgaard, Milton Tirado, Rodrigo Sierra, Kenneth R. Young, Gonzalo Francisco Rivas‐Torres, Pablo R. Stevenson, Angela Cano, Ophelia Wang, Cláudia Baider, Jos Barlow, Joice Ferreira, Erika Berenguer, Juliana Stropp, Henrik Balslev, Manuel Augusto Ahuite Reategui, Italo Mesones, Elvis H. Valderrama Sandoval, Therany Gonzales, Susamar Pansini, Neidiane Farias Costa Reis, Adeilza Felipe Sampaio, Vincent Antoine Vos, Walter Palacios Cuenca, Angelo Gilberto Manzatto, William Farfan‐Rios, Miles R. Silman, Karina Garcia‐Cabrera, Patricio von Hildebrand, Marcelino Carneiro Guedes, Janaina Barbosa Pedrosa Costa, Juan Fernando Phillips, César I. A. Vela, José Julio de Toledo, Daniela Pauletto, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Maria Natalia Umaña, Oliver L. Phillips, William E. Magnusson, Hans ter Steege, Flávia R. C. Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 33%
Environmental Science 20 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#464,756
of 26,317,969 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#68
of 2,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,788
of 439,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,317,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.