The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
無謀な賭けと合理性: 合理的な情報処理スタイルは無謀な賭けを抑制するか
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.11225/cs.2022.038 |
| Authors |
田岡 大樹, 楠見 孝 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,665,302
of 26,448,463 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#69
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,797
of 438,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,448,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.