The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
円柱形つまみの回転操作における指の使用状況について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.11247/jssdj.45.69 |
| Authors |
松崎 元, 大内 一雄, 上原 勝, 上野 義雪, 井村 五郎 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 94% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#99,468
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#1
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,108
of 330,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#1
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.